Trump Urges Senate to Scrap Filibuster in Bid to Resolve Government Shutdown

October 31, 2025 | Julian Park

President Donald Trump is escalating his battle with Democrats by urging the Senate to eliminate the filibuster, a parliamentary procedure that Senate Republicans would need to circumvent to end the current stalemate and put the federal government back in motion. The President's call comes amid rising frustration as the government remains partially shut down, affecting countless federal workers and services. While Republicans hold a majority in the Senate, they fall short of the 60-vote supermajority typically required to pass significant legislation such as a budget.

The filibuster has long been a topic of contention in the Senate, with supporters arguing it protects minority interests and encourages bipartisanship, while detractors claim it fosters gridlock. President Trump, however, appears convinced that the urgency of the situation demands decisive action, and dismantling the filibuster could be the key to navigating this political impasse. By abolishing it, Republicans could pass legislation with a simple majority, effectively sidelining Democrats in the budget negotiation process.

Yet, the President's proposal is not without risks. Doing away with such a procedural safeguard could fundamentally alter the balance of power in the Senate, setting a precedent that may later disadvantage the Republicans should the political tides turn against them. Moreover, there is some hesitation within the party, as key Republican figures express concerns about the long-term implications of Trump’s suggestion. They worry that such a move could estrange moderate constituents and lead to more dramatic swings in federal policy.

As the government shutdown drags on, pressure mounts on both sides to reach a resolution. With federal workers facing missed paychecks and essential services operating on bare-bones capacity, the stakes are high. Whether Trump's rallying cry to dismantle the filibuster will gain traction within the Senate remains to be seen, but its impact on the legislative process could be profound, ushering in a new era of Congressional dynamics.

| Daniel Cho

In an unprecedented intervention, two federal judges have mandated the Trump administration to allocate emergency funding specifically for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits.

| Daniel Cho

Since the governmental gears came to a grinding halt on October 1, President Trump has notably spent the majority of his time away from the hubbub of Washington, D.C.

| Lena Dorsey

In a decision with sweeping implications, Judge Indira Talwani acknowledged that millions of Americans would be left without assistance starting this Saturday.

| Soraya Amin

In a recent inquiry that taps into the economic pulse of the nation, we asked our readers a pressing question: Can young Americans today still hope to secure a better life than their parents?

| Theo Ramirez

As the stalemate in Washington drags into another week, the spotlight is intensifying on the availability of federal food assistance programs, which are at risk of running dry amid the prolonged government shutdown.

| Maya Caldwell

The sentencing of Taylor Taranto marks a significant chapter in the ongoing saga surrounding the January 6th storming of the U.S. Capitol.

| Julian Park

In a rare bipartisan move, a contingent of Republicans broke ranks this week to join Democrats in voting against President Trump's emergency tariffs on Brazil, Canada, and other countries.

| Lena Dorsey

In a move that underscores shifting priorities within the U.S. immigration framework, the Biden administration has set the lowest cap on refugee admissions since the program's inception in 1980.

| Soraya Amin

The struggling landscape of small independent supermarkets could face heightened challenges if a disruption in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits materializes, analysts warn.