Supreme Court Set to Weigh in on Birthright Citizenship Debate

May 15, 2025 | Lena Dorsey

President Trump's executive order aiming to restrict automatic citizenship for the children of certain immigrants has hit a significant roadblock, as federal judges in three separate districts have issued injunctions preventing its implementation. These legal hurdles were further solidified when each of the appellate courts upheld the injunctions. As a result, the case advanced to the Supreme Court, where it highlights two critical questions: the constitutional guarantee of birthright citizenship and the authority of judges to impose nationwide injunctions on federal policies.

Among those closely analyzing the Supreme Court proceedings is Amanda Frost, a law professor at the University of Virginia and author of the book You Are Not American: Citizenship Stripping from Dred Scott to the Dreamers. Professor Frost has been scrutinizing the justices’ line of questioning and arguments presented, gathering clues indicative of the court's leanings. Her observations could shed light on the potential direction the justices might take, in what promises to be a landmark decision.

Thursday's hearings do not occur in isolation; they resonate amidst a fraught national debate over immigration and the interpretation of the 14th Amendment's citizenship clause. At the heart of the matter is whether the founding guarantees of citizenship by birthright still hold firm in modern jurisprudence, or whether they can be curtailed by executive interpretation. The outcome is bound to have significant implications, both legally and politically, shaping the landscape of American citizenship.

For those avidly following the case without the clutter of external sponsorships, NPR offers an uninterrupted take through its Consider This+ service, available on Apple Podcasts or via the web at plus.npr.org. Listeners, policymakers, and legal scholars alike can anticipate profound ramifications from the highest bench in the land, as it seeks clarity on an issue that strikes at the essence of national identity.

| Julian Park

In a move that could spell further financial scrutiny for the controversial Infowars host, U.S. bankruptcy Trustee Christopher Murray has initiated legal action against Alex Jones.

| Daniel Cho

Former President Donald Trump has recently come forward endorsing a new initiative known as the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) agenda.

| Maya Caldwell

The Senate has released a highly anticipated text that has already begun to stir up concerns among GOP stakeholders in both chambers of Congress.

| Julian Park

In an unprecedented move, the NAACP has opted not to extend an invitation to President Donald Trump for their annual convention, marking the first time in 116 years a sitting U.S.

| Maya Caldwell

The somber ambiance of the Senate floor took on an air of palpable tension Tuesday as a prominent California Democrat ascended the dais.

| Soraya Amin

In a distinguished salute to public service, the nonprofit organization Partnership for Public Service has conferred upon David Lebryk the prestigious title of federal employee of the year.

| Daniel Cho

Some 20 cases remain to be decided — about a third of the total argued cases — many of them the most important of the term.

| Daniel Cho

As Virginians headed to the polls on Tuesday for the primary election, political analysts across the nation watched closely.

| Daniel Cho

In a commendable nod to dedication and innovation, the nonprofit organization, Partnership for Public Service, has bestowed its prestigious Federal Employee of the Year award to David Lebryk.