Wisconsin Supreme Court Clarifies: 1849 Law Doesn’t Prohibit Abortion

July 2, 2025 | Soraya Amin

In a pivotal decision that overturns decades of legal contention, the Wisconsin Supreme Court has ruled that the state’s centuries-old law does not constitute a ban on abortion. The ruling comes after years of contentious litigation following the U.S. Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision, which overturned the Roe v. Wade precedent and left the legality of abortion rights to the states. The liberal justices on Wisconsin’s high court have now clarified that the 1849 statute, often cited by opponents of abortion, no longer holds sway as a blanket prohibition within state lines.

This legal determination marks a significant shift in the legal landscape surrounding reproductive rights in Wisconsin. Advocates for abortion rights have hailed the Supreme Court's decision as a victory for personal freedoms and a step towards securing women's healthcare rights. For years, the statute, originally enacted when Wisconsin was a nascent state, has been at the center of ideological battles in courtrooms and the legislature. The liberal majority of justices argued that the historical context and intent of the statute differ vastly from contemporary interpretations and that its application as an anti-abortion law is outdated.

Opponents of the ruling contend that the court has overstepped by effectively negating a statute that, they argue, clearly delineated the state’s stance on abortion for over a century and a half. Critics assert that such a decisive move should be left to the legislative arm, not the courts, warning of a judiciary that molds existing laws to contemporary politico-social narratives. Nonetheless, the court's decision has been broadly embraced by healthcare providers and supporters of reproductive rights, who underscore the importance of legal clarity in delivering medical services.

The outcome may also have broader implications for the Midwest region, potentially influencing neighboring states’ legal strategies on abortion rights. As various state governments continue to grapple with the patchwork of laws and policies post-Dobbs, Wisconsin’s clarification serves as a notable example of judicial power reshaping state law. Moving forward, legal experts and state legislators are expected to reassess existing statutes to ensure they align with this landmark decision, shaping the evolution of reproductive rights legislation across the country.

| Theo Ramirez

In 2017, a surprising coalition of Republican governors voiced their opposition when President Trump first attempted to repeal the Affordable Care Act and scale back Medicaid.

| Soraya Amin

House Republicans edged closer towards a legislative victory early Thursday by overcoming a crucial procedural step, subsequently positioning themselves just one vote away from finalizing President Trump's ambitious tax cut and spending proposal.

| Lena Dorsey

The Senate marked a significant legislative victory on Tuesday, approving a comprehensive tax and spending bill that has been the center of extensive debate.

| Soraya Amin

The latest turn in U.S.-Vietnam trade relations followed an announcement made in the wake of President Trump's April proposal that called for a dramatic 46% tariff on imports from Vietnam.

| Maya Caldwell

In a move that has incited a spectrum of opinion across the nation, the Senate has passed a tax cut and spending bill that stands to markedly reshape the economic landscape.

| Daniel Cho

In a landscape where media outlets often find themselves in adversarial standoffs with public figures, CBS has opted for a strategic retreat.

| Maya Caldwell

In the corridors of Capitol Hill, where political alliances shift like leaves in the wind, the recent camaraderie between Senate Majority Leader John Thune and President Trump marks a distinct turn of tides.

| Ruthie Klein

In a move that underscores the fraught relationship between media conglomerates and political figures, Paramount Global has agreed to a $16 million settlement with former President Donald Trump.

| Maya Caldwell

California, spearheading a coalition of 20 state attorneys general, has drawn a legal line in the sand against the federal government over the use of Medicaid data.