State Department Makes a Typeface Turn: Revives Old Font

The State Department is set to revert to Times New Roman as the font of choice for all official documents, marking a shift from the previous decision made under the Biden administration. The previous adoption of Calibri was intended to enhance accessibility, particularly benefiting readers with certain disabilities. However, this recent directive underscores a renewed commitment to upholding traditional presentations, aligning with longstanding format preferences that have defined government communications for decades.

Times New Roman, a serif typeface known for its readability and classic aesthetic, has long been a staple in official and academic documents. The move to discard Calibri, a sans-serif font initially chosen for its modern and accessible design, reflects a broader debate within government agencies about balancing accessibility with tradition. While Calibri was praised for its clean and uncluttered look, Times New Roman's extensive history and widespread recognition may play pivotal roles in reestablishing the standard.

Critics of the transition back to Times New Roman argue that it disregards efforts to foster inclusivity for individuals with visual or cognitive disabilities who may benefit from fonts deliberately crafted for enhanced clarity. The initial decision to employ Calibri was part of a broader push to modernize government documents, ensuring that they are accessible to the widest possible audience. However, supporters of the change argue that Times New Roman continues to meet accessibility needs while maintaining a sense of formality and gravitas suitable for diplomatic correspondence.

As this shift takes effect, it may signal further reviews within other departments and agencies, potentially setting a precedent for how government documents are prepared and perceived worldwide. Whether or not this decision will spark broader changes in public institutions remains to be seen, but one certainty is clear: the choice of font in government documents is more than just aesthetic; it speaks volumes about institutional values and priorities.