Trump's Peace Board Commits Billions and Troop Deployment for Gaza Strategy

February 19, 2026 | Lena Dorsey

In a bold and unexpected move, former President Donald Trump announced a substantial commitment of $10 billion aimed at rebuilding the war-torn Gaza Strip. This landmark decision was unveiled during the inaugural meeting of his newly formed "Board of Peace" initiative, a platform he hopes will reinvigorate stalled peace efforts in the Middle East. The announcement underscores Trump's enduring influence in foreign policy circles and his continued interest in shaping global affairs.

The "Board of Peace," a Trump brainchild, is composed of a diverse array of diplomats, business leaders, and former military officials, all of whom share a common goal: to foster peace and stability in the region. At the gathering, Trump emphasized the strategic importance of investing in humanitarian and infrastructure projects in Gaza. His plan seeks to not only reconstruct buildings but also stimulate the local economy by creating jobs and promoting educational initiatives.

Sources close to the former president suggest this substantial financial package is a testament to his enduring commitment to the Abraham Accords, a series of normalization agreements between Israel and several Arab nations during his tenure. Critics, however, question the sustainability and the logistics of such a mammoth financial undertaking, citing Gaza's complex political terrain and historical challenges in aid distribution. Yet supporters argue that this bold pledge may catalyze further regional cooperation and usher in a new era of peace-making under Trump's unofficial but obviously engaged guidance.

Financial analysts are already speculating on the broader economic impacts of the proposed infusion of capital. Proponents argue this move will enhance regional stability, potentially lowering geopolitical risks associated with investment in the Middle East. Meanwhile, detractors remain skeptical, pointing out the ongoing political tensions within Gaza that could complicate the application of funds. The ripple effect of Trump's decision remains to be seen, but it's clear that his influence extends beyond domestic borders and continues to make waves on the international stage.

| Ruthie Klein

A proposed rule by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development is stirring controversy as it could potentially jeopardize the housing stability of nearly 80,000 individuals across the nation, a significant portion of whom are U.S.

| Lena Dorsey

In an unexpected twist, former Prince Andrew found himself embroiled in legal turmoil as U.K. police detained him today on suspicion of misconduct in public office, stirring a media frenzy throughout the nation.

| Ruthie Klein

In a characteristic move emblematic of his progressive platform, Senator Bernie Sanders, the Independent from Vermont, has taken his campaign trail to the sun-soaked avenues of California.

| Daniel Cho

Early voting kicked off this week for the Texas Senate Democratic primary election, setting the stage for what has already become a compelling race.

| Lena Dorsey

In a display reminiscent of Cold War naval posturing, Iran engaged in joint maritime exercises with Russia on Thursday, according to Tehran.

| Julian Park

In a renewed effort to address the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, President Donald Trump is set to convene a pivotal meeting on Thursday with representatives from over 24 nations that have pledged support to his newly formed Board of Peace.

| Julian Park

In a move that is sending shockwaves through Washington, President Trump has requested billions of dollars in damages from the federal government, a decision that places his own Justice Department in a perplexing and unprecedented ethical bind.

| Daniel Cho

Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO and founder of Meta Platforms Inc., is set to take the stand today in a landmark trial that scrutinizes the role of social media companies in the growing teen mental health crisis.

| Ruthie Klein

Criminal defense lawyers across the nation are increasingly attuned to what they perceive as an uptick in aggressive legal theories and atypical charging decisions emanating from the U.S. Department of Justice.