Supreme Court Overturns Trump's Tariff Policies

February 20, 2026 | Daniel Cho

In a landmark decision that has sent ripples through the political and economic landscape, the Supreme Court delivered a 6-3 ruling that effectively dismantles President's flagship economic initiative. This verdict underscores the growing judicial skepticism towards expansive executive ambitions. For the administration, it represents a significant setback, one that could reshape the president's economic agenda moving forward.

The genesis of this ruling stems from a challenging legal landscape where questions about the limits of presidential power in steering major economic policies were brought into sharp relief. Critics have long contended that the president overreached, crafting policy measures that bypassed the traditional legislative processes. Supporters, however, argue that innovative and bold action is necessary in these economically tumultuous times.

While the ruling was anticipated by many as a test of judicial independence, the broader implications for the enforcement of economic policies are profound. This decision signals potential hesitance among the judiciary to endorse unilateral executive actions without clear congressional backing. Consequently, the president is now facing an uphill battle in rallying legislative support to salvage aspects of his economic blueprint.

Market reactions to the ruling were immediate, with significant volatility observed as traders and businesses recalibrated expectations and strategic forecasts. Sector analysts anticipate shifts in policy direction might impact federal economic planning and risk assessments. The reverberations of this decision could reignite debates over the balance of power across the branches of government, setting the stage for a series of contentious legislative and judicial confrontations.

| Ruthie Klein

A proposed rule by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development is stirring controversy as it could potentially jeopardize the housing stability of nearly 80,000 individuals across the nation, a significant portion of whom are U.S.

| Lena Dorsey

In an unexpected twist, former Prince Andrew found himself embroiled in legal turmoil as U.K. police detained him today on suspicion of misconduct in public office, stirring a media frenzy throughout the nation.

| Ruthie Klein

In a characteristic move emblematic of his progressive platform, Senator Bernie Sanders, the Independent from Vermont, has taken his campaign trail to the sun-soaked avenues of California.

| Daniel Cho

Early voting kicked off this week for the Texas Senate Democratic primary election, setting the stage for what has already become a compelling race.

| Lena Dorsey

In a display reminiscent of Cold War naval posturing, Iran engaged in joint maritime exercises with Russia on Thursday, according to Tehran.

| Julian Park

In a renewed effort to address the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, President Donald Trump is set to convene a pivotal meeting on Thursday with representatives from over 24 nations that have pledged support to his newly formed Board of Peace.

| Julian Park

In a move that is sending shockwaves through Washington, President Trump has requested billions of dollars in damages from the federal government, a decision that places his own Justice Department in a perplexing and unprecedented ethical bind.

| Daniel Cho

Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO and founder of Meta Platforms Inc., is set to take the stand today in a landmark trial that scrutinizes the role of social media companies in the growing teen mental health crisis.

| Ruthie Klein

Criminal defense lawyers across the nation are increasingly attuned to what they perceive as an uptick in aggressive legal theories and atypical charging decisions emanating from the U.S. Department of Justice.