House Oversight Committee Moves to Hold Clintons in Contempt of Congress

January 21, 2026 | Soraya Amin

In a bold legislative maneuver, Republicans on the committee have successfully advanced their inquiry into the government’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, taking a significant step towards probing former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. The committee's decision, which passed by a razor-thin margin, now propels the matter to the full House for further deliberation.

This development marks an escalation in the ongoing political tug-of-war surrounding the high-profile case. The Republicans argue that questioning the Clintons could unearth crucial details about Epstein's interactions with powerful figures and reveal potential lapses in oversight during critical phases of the investigation. The move has predictably stirred intense reactions across the political spectrum, setting the stage for a heated debate in the House.

Democrats on the committee have criticized the decision, labeling it as a partisan tactic aimed at undermining the Clintons and deflecting attention from pressing legislative priorities. They contend that the focus should remain on the broader systemic issues that allowed Epstein’s crimes to persist unchecked, rather than veering into what they see as politically motivated inquiries.

The impending House vote will be a litmus test for both parties, gauging the intensity of partisan divisions in an already polarized Congress. As both sides prepare for what promises to be a contentious showdown, the stakes are high, and the political implications could reverberate far beyond the confines of the Epstein case.

| Lena Dorsey

In a tense intersection of civil rights activism and religious sanctity, a noted civil rights attorney and at least two other individuals have been apprehended following their participation in a protest that disrupted a church service.

| Theo Ramirez

In a dramatic turn of events on Capitol Hill, the House of Representatives witnessed a nail-biting vote on a crucial war powers resolution. Despite bipartisan efforts, the motion ultimately failed to pass in a tie, concluding with a 215-215 deadlock.

| Maya Caldwell

In a significant development on Capitol Hill, the House of Representatives has given the green light to the final tranche of spending bills, effectively averting a looming government shutdown.

| Julian Park

On a tumultuous Sunday morning in St. Paul, protesters disrupted a service at the Cities Church, drawing attention to the dual roles of one of its pastors—a local official connected to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

| Maya Caldwell

In a highly anticipated session that captivated watchers across the political spectrum, Jack Smith, the former special counsel, delivered his first public testimony before the House Judiciary Committee.

| Soraya Amin

The move comes on the heels of an unusual courtroom drama, where a federal judge made headlines with a scathing statement regarding Ms. Halligan's position as the United States Attorney.

| Soraya Amin

With the 2024 presidential election looming, our eyes turn to the heart of Trump's loyalist enclave to gauge the pulse on the former president's second-term agenda.

| Maya Caldwell

In a striking rebuke, a federal judge has cast a shadow over the Department of Justice, criticizing the legitimacy of the acting United States Attorney, Ms. Halligan.

| Soraya Amin

In the heart of the Swiss Alps, global economic leaders have converged for the World Economic Forum's annual congregation.